11/11/2023 0 Comments Gitkraken checkout specific commit![]() ![]() " git rebase A B" ( man) where B is not a commit should behave as if the HEAD got detached at B and then the detached HEAD got rebased on top of A.Ī bug however overwrites the current branch to point at B, when B is a descendant of A (i.e. (Merged by Junio C Hamano - gitster - in commit f818536, ) rebase: set REF_HEAD_DETACH in checkout_up_to_date() See commit bdff97a, commit 77ab58c () by John Cai ( john-cai). " git rebase $base $non_branch_commit" ( man), when $base is an ancestor or the $non_branch_commit, modified the current branch, which has been corrected with Git 2.36 (Q2 2022). it would not in some case, before Git 2.36: To check out the original branch and stop rebasing, run "git rebase -abort".Īctually, using as last parameter a commit ( ) instead of a branch name ( topic), should create a detached branch: A - B - C masterĮxcept. If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git rebase -skip" instead. When you have resolved this problem, run "git rebase -continue". The copy of the patch that failed is found in. git/rebase-apply/patch:17: trailing whitespace.įalling back to patching base and 3-way merge.ĬONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pom.xml git/rebase-apply/patch:10: trailing whitespace. Using index info to reconstruct a base tree. The accepted solution lead me to a merge conflict (too lazy to fix by hand): $ git rebase tempįirst, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it. I found it much easier to read and understand. I've used a mixture of solutions described above: $ git branch temp Will apply commits Y and Z to commit C, effectively deleting commit X Will apply commits B, C, X, Y, Z to commit D and end up skipping B and C because they already have been applied. ![]() Using this starting point: A - B - C - D - E master Now that git has selected the commits it will cut and move, it applies them in order to, skipping any that are already applied to target. is itself an optional command and if it is not specified, then git looks at the parent of the checked out branch which is the equivalent of entering master. In our case, an of B, C, D, or master will all result in commit B serving as the cut point. However, if is not an ancestor, then git backs up the chain from the specified commit until if finds a common ancestor with the checked out branch (and aborts if it can't find one). All commits after until the head of the checked out branch are the ones that will be moved. In the example I provided, this would be anything that isn't C, D, or master. ![]() If it is a commit that is an ancestor of the checked out branch, then it serves as the cut point. is special because it can mean two different things. To move the entire feature branch, you can not select X, Y, Z, or feature as the since those all are commits inside the group being moved. can be any commit that won't be contained in the string of commits being moved. When providing a branch name, you are simply specifying the head commit of that branch. is the commit we will attach our string of commits to. Note that you must have specified in order to specify or git will think you are specifying. If you've already checked out the branch you want to rebase, then you don't need this. is optional and all it does is checks out the branch specified before executing the rest of the command. The basic form of the command we need, cribbed from the documentation, is: git rebase -onto ] Rebase Any String of Commits to a Target Commit If topic is not checked out, you simply append topic to the command (except the last one) like so: git rebase -onto B master topicĪlternatively, check out the branch first with: git checkout topic The correct command to answer the posted question could be any of the following (assuming branch topic is already checked out): git rebase -onto B master ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |